On 4/8/02 6:10 PM, "Dennis Burnham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> What I also discovered is that sometimes the Add Sender to Address Book
> command works and other times it refuses to perform.  Can't figure out why,
> and it does not seem to be dependent on HTML vs. Plain text

The ONLY way that your Address Book comes into it is if you see that the
email is directed to someone with the little contact icon (the little stick
man) in the To header of your own new message. that way you know it's going
to the right person of that name or address. But it has nothing to do with
the attribution line in replies. That is related to the headers only.
> 
> 
> 
> 1.  Here is the header of a message I received from someone who is NOT in my
> address book.  Also, this message was considered "junk" by the spam filters.
> However, when I tested writing a reply, the attribution was CORRECT.
> 

>> From: Eric Bickford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

It had a From line with both display name and <address> so it was correct.

> 
> 
> 2.   Here is the header of a message I received from someone who IS in my
> address book.   When I tested the reply, the attribution was CORRECT.
> 

>> From: "Bill Clarke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Same thing.

> 
> 
> 3.  Here is the header of a message I received from someone who IS in my
> address book.  When I tested the reply, the attribution was WRONG.
> 

>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 It wasn't actually WRONG, since there's no display name, all it can do is
 
    [EMAIL PROTECTED] at <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> 
> 4.  Here is the header of another message I received from someone else who
> IS in my address book.  When I tested the reply, the attribution was WRONG.
> But note that the way her email prefs are entered is wrong too.
> 

>> From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

That wasn't wrong either. Since she doesn't list a display name in her own
outgoing email program, the email address was recorded as her display name
in her own outgoing email. So your reply is actually 100% CORRECT. How in
the world is Entourage supposed to know that's not her real name if that's
how she lists it? (In Entourage, every account you have asks you for your
display name. In her own email program it probably does too, only she left
her preferences blank or couldn't be bothered to fill it out. Or just maybe
she was writing from a web browser or something basic like that.)
> 
> 
> 5.  Here is the header of another message I received from someone else who
> IS in my address book.  When I tested the reply, the attribution was WRONG.
> 
>> Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> From: "michael.woody" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

That's odder, especially since the display name correctly has quotes around
it , as it should when there's punctuation. perhaps Entourage is being
careful, and is suspicious of a so-called name that has a period in it. or
more likely it's to do with length: that email address is so long that with
the name as well it might exceed some length. But i don't really know., That
one should have ad both name and address. Its got nothing to do with the
Address Book.
> 
> 
> 6.  Here is the header of a message I received from someone who IS NOT in my
> address book.  When I tested the reply, the attribution was CORRECT.
> 

>> From: Roxy Kurta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Proper name and address again. The only odd one in the bunch is no.5.  was
that a private email? The reason why my name and address came out wrong
(last message) was because it was from a mailing list.


-- 
Paul Berkowitz


-- 
To unsubscribe:                     
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
archives:       
<http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.letterrip.com/>
old-archive:       
<http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.boingo.com/>

Reply via email to