Hi, >>> My personal opinion is that 768 MB is where OSX becomes useable. >> >> Does that exist ? More than 512 MB ? > > I really noticed the difference when I went to 768 MB. As soon as my chip > arrives, I'm going up to the max, 1000 MB. Can't wait.
FWIW, I tried that, spent the money, am no better off. I had 512 Mb RAM on my iMac (10.1.5 and 9.2.2, with 80 Gb hard disk) and trying to work with "Aqua" was far more like "Molassa". Excited at the prospect of *any* speed improvements I doubled my RAM to 1 Gb -- with absolutely nil noticeable improvement. This cost me $450. There may well have been some slight improvement but nowt noticeable. Btw, "Jaguar" will only have to move at a snail's pace to be a huge leap forward... Cheers, Ian Horner Journalist Sydney -- To unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> archives: <http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.letterrip.com/> old-archive: <http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.boingo.com/>
