Dear Eric, On 10-08-2002 01:04, "Eric Hildum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Apple clearly indicates what is a minimum and what is a recommended > installation. Where can I find what is recommended ? > You chose to run minimum, so you should expect low > performance. You would have the same issue on any upgrade in Windows; worse > actually, as usually a Windows upgrade requires a processor upgrade as well > as memory increases. No excuse for Apple to start behaving in a similar way. > As for the transparency effects, I find it very helpful to be able to see > underlying windows while I work. I do not need as much mouse motion to see > the information I need to get things done. So I am glad they did it. Ok, that's noted. > And > yes, I did spring for a little extra memory - $50 isn't an issue considering > the significant benefits of upgrading to OS X. 50$ for how much RAM? > No one is forcing you to upgrade. I felt forced: OS9 people, are they still taken care of ? All soft apps are now OSX it seems. Aren't they forced to step over to OSX 1-2-3, ... OSX1 I learn here is messy programmed so that unlike other Unix interfaces is very slow... But I am not forced to buy OSX2 ? And then I find out there are all kind of patches missing in that Jaguar version ? And I have to swallow that my email address is taken away, not even a tag they leave to forward incoming mail to another mailbox at my choice, I can't even copy the source code of my iTools website... And Apple users only live in the Western World and the Rich Countries... 50 $ here 100$ next year... Sure... I our association we learned to calculate in ECO's, a currency that takes into account your buying power, average wage, cost of bread and eggs, etc... Apple could learn from us... 50 ECOS would be 50$ for most American citizens, 55 Euros for Swedish people, but only 2 $/Euro's for a guy living in Ethiopia... Where they need internet a lot ! More: look up EYFA & ECO Sven -- To unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> archives: <http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.letterrip.com/> old-archive: <http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.boingo.com/>
