Title: Re: Entourage, Address Book, and iSync
Why would this be preferred over support for Entourage in iSync (not that we can do that until Apple opens up iSync).

Dan

On 1/14/03 11:00 AM, "Eric Hildum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

I spent some time playing with iSync last night, and found it a very useful application. I have a number of computers that I would like to keep synchronized, and this did the job quite nicely. However, in playing with the synchronization of the Address Book, I realized that my previous request for an integration of iSync and Entourage was not the best way to accomplish what I need, and there is a better way. Instead of synchronizing via iSync, I would prefer to see Entourage make use of the Address Book in one of two ways:

  1. Adopt the Address Book as the repository of contact information. The Address Book is extensible, so all of the information currently maintained in the Entourage contact database can be placed into the Address Book.
  2. Build a direct synchronization into Entourage to synchronize the Entourage Contacts with Address book entries (that is, make use of the existing Address Book API). In this case also, Entourage should synchronize all fields via the extensibility features of the Address Book. This could be selected in a preferences option (e.g., Synchronize contacts with Address Book). In this case, contacts could be synchronized directly by Entourage, or by a daemon process.

In both cases, editing a contact in either database should automatically propagate to the other database.

I considered an Applescript solution, but since there are so many fields in Entourage contacts that are not scriptable, this does not really solve the problem.


Reply via email to