on 6/2/04 1:47 PM, Allen Watson at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On or near 6/1/04 6:34 PM, Russell Carr at [EMAIL PROTECTED] observed: > >>> This does not solve the puzzle of why the rule isn't executing (or is being >>> overridden), I realize, but I am attempting just to understand why you want >>> the criteria, as Paul asked. >>> >> Nor did Pauls' suggestion on moving the rule to in front of my move rules. >> The delete rule is now the second rule being run (after a rule that moves >> emails from family and friends into a separate folder) and still doesn't >> work. The move rules follow after the delete rule and still work. The >> original digests are being automatically moved into their storage folders. >> > So, the messages that are NOT getting processed by your rules are ones that > have been generated by bursting the digest. Let me see if I am understanding > you correctly: You claim that some of your rules DO execute and process some > messages created by bursting the digest, while this particular rule, which > comes first in the list, apparently does not execute. Is that correct? > > I would not be surprised if no rules execute against messages generated by > bursting; it seems logical to me that the rules would only execute against > incoming messages, and technically, generated messages are not "incoming". > You may be on to something. The rule that doesn't work is suppose to work on messages generated by the digest bursting. It works manually after the bursting is over. The rule that does work moves the original digest itself.
I will try another rule to see if a rule will work on other burst generated messages. I am currently experimenting with checking for the presence of only the From header, but as there I have been no digests today I have no results. -- To unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> archives: <http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.letterrip.com/> old-archive: <http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.boingo.com/>
