On 9/30/05 5:34 PM, Scott Haneda at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I am not 100% sure what hostname they want you to use, but there is no > reason everyone should not just move to port 587, port 25 is going away on > most providers as a way to combat spam, hotels will always hijack it, use > the alt port.
I quite agree about using port 587. I use port 587 all the time and I've yet to have to reconfigure to get around any sort of port blocking and hijacking. And, since I run my own mail server and just in case some idiot ISP decides to block or hijack 587 as well (which they shouldn't since a properly configured mail server only accepts authenticated connections on 587), I also have an additional port set up to accept authenticated connections. -- Larry Stone [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.stonejongleux.com/ -- To unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> archives: <http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.letterrip.com/> old-archive: <http://www.mail-archive.com/entourage-talk%40lists.boingo.com/>
