Joe,

It is mathematics, a TOOL for understanding the universe.

Ed

"Two roads diverged in a yellow wood, And sorry I could not travel both. "
Robert Frost (1874-1963). Mountain Interval. 1920. 
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Joseph Zorzin 
  To: [email protected] 
  Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 8:42 PM
  Subject: [ENTS] Re: Rendezvous Report



  Ed, is E=MC squared science or engineering?

  Joe

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: "Edward Frank" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
  To: <[email protected]>
  Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 5:05 PM
  Subject: [ENTS] Re: Rendezvous Report


  Joe,

  The world expressed as a series of equations is an engineering concept not a 
  scientific one.

  ********** Ed, is "E=MC" squared science or engineering?


    In order to be valid we must know all things about every variable of the 
  proposition.

  ********** Science doesn't have to "know" all things about all the 
  variables- it only needs to build models- then test them, then improve the 
  model, etc.


    Since we do not know, and perhaps can not know all things about every 
  variable in a complex system, then our scientific understanding will be 
  limited to only the most simple of things.

  ********** Not sure what you mean....

    That is one of the great failures of modern science, perhaps driven by our 
  ability to manipulate numbers so well by computer, is the drive to quantify 
  everything and to simply ignore things that can't be readily quantified.

  **********  Quantification along with theorizing, model building, testing 
  and modification of theories and models, is what makes science different 
  than other forms of inquiry.


    There is often the opinion that a bad quantification is better than no 
  numbers at all.  That is not true, if the the bad models resulting from bad 
  quantification lead you to the wrong conclusions.

  ********** You'll only be led to the wrong concludions if you do wrong 
  testing of the models. Sure, numbers along prove nothing but without numbers 
  you can't test the model. Without testing a model you depned on faith.


    We need to categorize things iteratively, but the arbitrary assignment of 
  numbers to poorly understood phenomena doesn't help.

  **********  Arbitrary assignment of numbers certainly isn't the method of 
  science.


    Scientific understanding is based upon a logic structure that may contain 
  equations, but does not need to be numerical to be scientific.

  ********** Without numbers, you might still come up with good thinking, but 
  it's not likely to qualify as science. I can't think of any science that 
  doesn't depend on math- science is about relationships best expressed 
  numerically. The modeling can exist without numbers at a very early stage 
  when the theory hasn't advanced enough.


    Requiring a concept be an equation with may quantifiable variables limits 
  the ability to investigate or to even understand many natural phenomena.

  ********** A concept may be fine without an equation- but a concept does not 
  rise to the level of science without numbers of various sorts, equations, 
  statistics, etc.


    Mathematical formulas and equations are a tool of scientific 
  investigation, but are not themselves science, no more than a shovel is the 
  same thing as a hole in the ground.

  ********** Yes, the math is a tool of science- but not much science exists 
  without that tool- it's actually more of a tool, it's the way in which the 
  particular science is expressed to indicate relationships between variables, 
  without which you can't build a model, without which you can't test it, and 
  without testing, you don't have science.

  Not that I would know, I'm no Phd- I'm only a lowly field forester, what 
  would I know? <G>

  Joe

  Ed

  "Two roads diverged in a yellow wood, And sorry I could not travel both. "
  Robert Frost (1874-1963). Mountain Interval. 1920.
    ----- Original Message ----- 
    From: Joseph Zorzin
    To: [email protected]
    Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 4:18 PM
    Subject: [ENTS] Re: Rendezvous Report


    Joe
    PS: to me, the concept is an equation with many variables- each variable
    must be quantifiable including values not yet in the marketplace- while
    social and political values also plugged into the equation must be
    transparent.





  
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
Eastern Native Tree Society http://www.nativetreesociety.org

You are subscribed to the Google Groups "ENTSTrees" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/entstrees?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to