Gary- Well that's true, if and only if the assumption is made that there weren't any trees back then taller than 200'...we don't really definitively know, although white pines don't share the "biological mechanics" of the redwoods...
-Don > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [ENTS] A Large Tree article in 1849 > Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 17:04:52 -0500 > > Sorry he didn't answer the question Tim. Personally, I don't think a > white pine at this latitude will do much over 200 if that. 300? No > way, there would be no reason for a tree to grow over 100 feet above > all others. > > Gary > > On Nov 14, 2009, at 4:00 PM, Timothy Zelazo <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > -- > Eastern Native Tree Society http://www.nativetreesociety.org > Send email to [email protected] > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/entstrees?hl=en > To unsubscribe send email to [email protected] _________________________________________________________________ Hotmail: Trusted email with powerful SPAM protection. http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/177141665/direct/01/ -- Eastern Native Tree Society http://www.nativetreesociety.org Send email to [email protected] Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/entstrees?hl=en To unsubscribe send email to [email protected]
