Tim,

 

I’d like to see anyone fell a 300 foot white pine and only “spoil” 14 feet of 
the tree. Total nonsense. Such a tree never existed and never will. These 
accounts are horrid and simply discredit the accurate work we ENTS currently 
do. Whose foot did they use anyway? Perhaps it is time we post the standards of 
ENTS metrics on the website so no one will question our numbers. Bob, how large 
would a 300’ white pine need to be based on a “normal” taper factor?

 

Will F. Blozan

President, Eastern Native Tree Society

President, Appalachian Arborists, Inc.

 

"No sympathy for apathy"

  _____  

From: Timothy Zelazo [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Saturday, November 14, 2009 4:00 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [ENTS] A Large Tree article in 1849

 

ENTS:

 

While I was doing some historic research on the cultural history of the Natural 
Bridge State Park, located in North Adams Massachusetts, I found an interesting 
article in the Weekly Transcript, North Adams, Mass., Thursday, July 12, 1849.

 

A Large Tree. --- Mr. D. E. Hawks, of Charlemont, cut a Pine tree a short time 
since, of the following dimensions.  It was 7 feet through 10 feet from the 
stump, and 5 feet through 50 feet from the stump.  Twenty-two logs were taken 
from the tree, the average length of which were 12 feet.  Fourteen feet of the 
tree were spoiled in falling.  The extreme length of the tree from the stump 
to the top twigs was 300 feet! ---- Greenfield Gazette.

 

 

I asked Robert Campanile if he thought this was possible and here is the 
response he gave me.

 

TREE GENETICS

There can be enormous variation among the different individuals of any one 
species and this is partly genetic. For instance, grain and figure may vary, 
just like human fingerprints. There may be no specific benefit from such 
variation. But if there is no great natural selective pressure not to vary, 
then variations will creep in. Genomes are not commandments, which say exactly 
what to do come what may. Genes present options. They operate in dialogue with 
the environment. So the same tree, grown under different circumstances, could 
grow in very different ways, and the effects of the different circumstances are 
reflected in the timber, height, width, etc. The growing timber responds to the 
stresses and strains and pressures just as the bone of mammals may do.

In forests, trees grow straight and tall, anxious for the light. That and the 
resources needed to accomplish that growth will be factors in determining the 
height and shape of the tree needed to get the light. Conifers are generally 
light lovers. To this end they have a trick – many can grow very tall very 
quickly. This is why in the far north they tend to be very tall and thin – 
the sun is always low in the sky and so they get most of their light from the 
side. The environment dictates the conditions and the challenge, and genes can 
sometimes help meet that challenge with the variance in growth and natural 
processes that the genetic code allows.

 

Tim

 

 

-- 
Eastern Native Tree Society http://www.nativetreesociety.org
Send email to [email protected]
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/entstrees?hl=en
To unsubscribe send email to [email protected]

-- 
Eastern Native Tree Society http://www.nativetreesociety.org
Send email to [email protected]
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/entstrees?hl=en
To unsubscribe send email to [email protected]

Reply via email to