I concur when you aver!

Gary

On Nov 14, 2009, at 10:00 PM, Bob <[email protected]> wrote:

> Ed, Tim, Gary, Don, et al,
>
>      White pines that rise significantly above the surrounding  
> canopy are at extra risk from wind events. So our mythical 300- 
> hundred footer would have had to be in an area that received plenty  
> of protection from the wind. Additionally, it would have needed to  
> be in an area that possesses the right kind of soil for tall white  
> pines (sand-silt), receives sufficient moisture, etc. But even if  
> these conditions were met, what would be the incentive for a pine to  
> continue growing to eventually reach such an improbable height?  
> Competition? White pines reach their greatest heights in stands  
> (with rare exceptions). So our mythical pine would have likely had  
> company. The 300-footer would have had 250-footer companions. The  
> scenario becomes wildly improbable.
>
> Bob
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Nov 14, 2009, at 6:26 PM, "Edward Frank" <[email protected]>  
> wrote:
>
>> Tim,
>>
>> I always enjoy reading these historical accounts, whether they are  
>> deemed accurate or not.  If you come across more, please post them  
>> to the list.  I like the response regarding genetics as well.  I  
>> must comment however when he talks about some variations have no  
>> specific benefit.  Well - there might be some examples, but looking  
>> at things from the perspective of paleontology, there are very few  
>> genetic variations that do not have some adaptive purpose and if  
>> they have an adaptive purpose, then they are selected for or  
>> against.  Things that might not have a "purpose,"  if I were to  
>> postulate that left or right handedness did not have a purpose,  
>> then the degree of variation between the two variable opposites  
>> tend to be minimal so that selection would not prefer one to the  
>> other.
>>
>> Tree height has a very distinct purpose and is selected for  
>> dependant on the particular environmental conditions.  Therefore  
>> the height parameter  in one area of the range is different than in  
>> other areas of the range.   Trees in that portion of the range fall  
>> within the heights genetically selected for in that region.  In  
>> other cases the genes for a variety of different conditions are all  
>> present and environmental conditions turn one set of genes on and  
>> another off, dependant on conditions.  An example is a fish in some  
>> Mexican caves.  When found in darkness in the depths of the caves,  
>> they do not grow eyes, while the same species in surface pools do  
>> grow eyes.  Parent that are eyeless will spawn eyed fish if moved  
>> to the light, and eyed parents will spawn eyeless fish if they are  
>> moved to the dark.  I don't believe that there is enough variation  
>> in genetic height potential to grow a 300 foot tall tree in New  
>> England.
>>
>> The other consideration is one of environmental conditions.   
>> Overall tree heights seem to correlate with latitude, taller trees  
>> are more southerly and shorter trees are found more northerly.  I  
>> wonder also about weather conditions.  The tops of many of the  
>> taller trees do not seem to be stopped by reaching a growth limit,  
>> but rather a point at which the rate of breakage under the weather/ 
>> climatic conditions equal the rate of growth.  This is especially  
>> true once the trees emerge from the generalized canopy height.  So  
>> perhaps tree height is not only limited by their own genetics, but  
>> limited indirectly by the genetics of the trees with which they  
>> share the forest.  A tree growing among taller species may grow  
>> higher than a tree growing among shorter species.  Anybody have any  
>> comments? [If so maybe we should start a new subject]
>>
>> Ed Frank
>>
>>
>>
>> Check out my new Blog:  http://nature-web-network.blogspot.com/  
>> (and click on some of the ads)
>> -- 
>> Eastern Native Tree Society http://www.nativetreesociety.org
>> Send email to [email protected]
>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/entstrees?hl=en
>> To unsubscribe send email to [email protected]
>
> -- 
> Eastern Native Tree Society http://www.nativetreesociety.org
> Send email to [email protected]
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/entstrees?hl=en
> To unsubscribe send email to [email protected]

-- 
Eastern Native Tree Society http://www.nativetreesociety.org
Send email to [email protected]
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/entstrees?hl=en
To unsubscribe send email to [email protected]

Reply via email to