Thanks,
Rather than raise an already-discussed issue I can scour the archives.
-Jon

On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 6:15 PM, Beth Koebel <[email protected]> wrote:
> Jon,
> I believe that we talked about the book 1492 before. Maybe this was before 
> you joined. I'm sure that someone will be able to dig up page for you and the 
> others that have joined since.
> Beth
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Nov 27, 2009, at 16:28, jon parker <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> I might add one layer of thought to this discussion, which is the idea
> that many of the unruly forests the European settlers first saw were
> possibly a direct consequence of the decimation of Native American
> populations due to introduced diseases that advanced far ahead (and
> far sooner) of the settlers themselves.  Prior to the epidemics, some
> theories put forth claim that North American forests were heavily
> managed through a variety of man-assisted processes, fire being the
> primary tool.  The author Thomas Mann wrote a book about the impact of
> Pre-Columbian people on the New World environment, "1491", which
> covers theories about America from this point of view.  Some excerpts
> from the book can be found here:
> http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200203/mann
>
> I read the book and would recommend it, even if I feel that
> occasionally his case is overstated a bit (I don't really buy that the
> Amazon is largely an American Indian-influenced ecology, seems to
> ignore a lot of evolutionary evidence).
>
> On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 2:43 AM, DON BERTOLETTE <[email protected]> wrote:
> Ed/Bob-
> 1737?
> I could have said the same thing in SE Kentucky!  Working on the Daniel
> Boone NF, after Ford Motor Company and Peabody Coal had had their way with
> the land that went to the Redbird Purchase Unit (first step towards becoming
> a Ranger Station, had to be rehabilitated (yeah, I went through the 60's and
> know about Arlo Guthrie and what he thought about being rehabilitated)
> first).
>
> I would go the whole day, and not see a hand's worth of sunlight.  Heck, I
> wouldn't even see the ground for hours at a time...no telling how many
> rattlers and coppermouths I walked within striking distance of!
>
> So when travellers went across the Mogollon Plateau (Northern Arizona) three
> or four horses abreast without large ponderosa pines obstructing their
> passage (the proverbial open park-like forests), I totally understood what
> they were getting at.
>
> Once I got through high schools version of history, I understood how the
> pilgrims/explorers wanted to clear deep dark forests...but all that has to
> do with where you came from...which is along way from universal human
> experiences...
> -Don
>
> ________________________________
> Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 01:38:33 +0000
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [ENTS] Historic eastern forest stature
>
> Ed,
> I agree. I wasn't too clear on one point. I certainly wouldn't advocate
> comparing current old growth sites to the forests on sites that used to be
> old growth. What I meant was if it is old growth now, such as the Porcupine
> Mtns State Park, then its appearance now versus the way it looked in the
> pre-settlement past may not be very different - or at least different in a
> then versus now way.  Lee, help!
> Bob
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Edward Frank" <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2009 2:45:27 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
> Subject: Re: [ENTS] Historic eastern forest stature
>
> Bob,
>
> Excellent overview of the situation.  I would like to point out however that
> while these are old growth forests that give an example of what once existed
> in the eastern United States, that these forests are not representative of
> all of the forest types that once existed.  They are examples only of primal
> forest of the types found in the Adirondacks and the Catskills.  A
> historical account of the primary hemlock dominated forest here in the
> Allegheny Plateau Region of Pennsylvania reads:
>
>
> According to Conrad Weiser in 1737, "The wood is so thick, that for a mile
> at a time we could not find a place the size of a hand, where the sunshine
> would penetrate, even on the clearest day."
>
> These forests are dissimilar in may ways to those found in the Catskills and
> Adirondacks.  Similarly there were chestnut dominated forests where upwards
> of 90% of the tree basal area were American Chestnut trees.  These forest
> are also long gone.  There are wide variety of forest types that once
> covered large areas of the United States that are now all but lost and are
> not represented by the forests of the Catskills and Adirondacks.
>
> I would tend to agree that these remaining sections of forest in the
> Adirondacks and the Catskills are better analogues of the former forests in
> the eastern United States than the Bialowieza forest of Poland and Belarus.
> Bialowieza Forest represents but a single forest type and it consists of
> trees native to that region rather than the assemblage found here in the
> United States.  Smaller old growth patches and sites, like Cook Forest give
> the flavor of the variety of the forest types that once occupied other areas
> of the eastern United States. Still there is an uneasy feeling when visiting
> them of the limited size they encompass, rather than the immensity of the
> ancient forests that once covered 90% of the countryside.  There is the
> feeling of bustling humanity and civilization just beyond your view.  You
> can only really capture a portion of the essence of these untrammeled
> forests if you concentrate on the scene that surrounds you and the details
> of the forest, rather than the context of the forest in relation to the
> modern landscape.
>
> Happy Thanksgiving Everyone.
>
> Ed Frank
>
>
> Check out my new Blog:  http://nature-web-network.blogspot.com/ (and click
> on some of the ads)
> --
> Eastern Native Tree Society http://www.nativetreesociety.org
> Send email to [email protected]
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/entstrees?hl=en
> To unsubscribe send email to [email protected]
> --
> Eastern Native Tree Society http://www.nativetreesociety.org
> Send email to [email protected]
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/entstrees?hl=en
> To unsubscribe send email to [email protected]
> ________________________________
> Windows 7: I wanted simpler, now it's simpler. I'm a rock star.
>
> --
> Eastern Native Tree Society http://www.nativetreesociety.org
> Send email to [email protected]
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/entstrees?hl=en
> To unsubscribe send email to [email protected]
>
> --
> Eastern Native Tree Society http://www.nativetreesociety.org
> Send email to [email protected]
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/entstrees?hl=en
> To unsubscribe send email to [email protected]
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Eastern Native Tree Society http://www.nativetreesociety.org
> Send email to [email protected]
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/entstrees?hl=en
> To unsubscribe send email to [email protected]

-- 
Eastern Native Tree Society http://www.nativetreesociety.org
Send email to [email protected]
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/entstrees?hl=en
To unsubscribe send email to [email protected]

Reply via email to