Bob:

The 10,000 acres figure for parks would be correct if you count the high 
density core of the Metro Area, aka "inner city" only.

Lee

[email protected] wrote:
> Lee,
>
> Wow, 70,000 acres of parks in Minneapolis is amazing! I had no idea 
> the city had that much. I don't know what I thought the acreage is - 
> perhaps 10,000. 
>
> Bob
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Lee Frelich" <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Sent: Monday, November 30, 2009 9:21:57 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
> Subject: Re: [ENTS] Observing nature...
>
> Bob:
>
> Judging from the article about a single tree in Cambridge (which Harvard
> was going to cut down because it was judged a hazard tree) that appeared
> in The Boston Globe on the same page as the article about my earthworm
> research two years ago,  I would say people in Boston take trees pretty
> seriously.
>
> Did I mention that in the Minneapolis Metro Area we have at least
> 70,000+ acres of parks, including three state parks and several regional
> parks that are 2,000-5,000 acres in size? This includes about 20 miles
> of Mississippi River frontage, 20 miles on the Minnesota River and 10s
> of miles of frontage on smaller rivers, 500 lakes greater than 10 acres
> in size (not counted in the acreage total), at least six natural areas
> (3 with unlogged sugar maple, oak and basswood forest, 2 with unlogged
> white pine forest, and 2 with prairie and savanna), and units like the
> 2600 acre Louisville Swamp, part of a national wildlife refuge, with
> large tracts of savanna, marsh, heron rookeries, dwarf oak forest and
> giant cottonwood forest. There is also the 900 acre Minnesota Landscape
> Arboretum which has a vast collection of garden plants that will grow in
> our climate as well as trees from around the world, arranged by taxa
> around a 3-mile loop. The parking lots of these places are usually full
> on weekends, but they are big enough that they don't feel crowded while
> hiking.
>
> Lee
>
> [email protected] wrote:
> > Lee,
> >
> > You've spoken convincingly about the Minneapolis citizenry's
> > appreciation for their trees and I am impressed by the demonstrations
> > of tree awareness. Maybe I judge the people I saw yesterday in the
> > Arboretum too seriously. It wouldn't be the first time I've done that
> > where tree awareness is concerned.
> >
> > Bob
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Lee Frelich" <[email protected]>
> > To: [email protected]
> > Sent: Sunday, November 29, 2009 9:57:20 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
> > Subject: Re: [ENTS] Observing nature...
> >
> > Bob:
> >
> > Next time you are in Wisconsin, lets visit Concrete County Park. They
> > have hundreds of concrete animals--elephants, lions, deer, bear,
> > giraffes, etc., and a few concrete trees. They were made by an eccentric
> > man whose yard was made into a park after he died. No chance that they
> > will bite you either, although the local deer ticks an Lyme disease are
> > a concern. These concrete animals and trees in the park were the only
> > things left standing for miles in any direction after the great blowdown
> > of July 4th, 1977, which took out a swath of forest 15 miles wide by 150
> > miles long with winds as high as 157 miles per hour--another one of our
> > Midwestern thunderstorms that are the eighth wonder of the world.
> >
> > Regarding trees, people jog right by the trees in Minneapolis too. But
> > if the city puts a dot of paint on one (various colors indicate
> > different diseases or problems with the tree, and that it might have to
> > be cut down), you should hear the calls that come in accusing the
> > forestry department of being tree killers. Whenever a tree is marked in
> > my neighborhood, or on campus, I get phone calls and e-mails about it,
> > but have become expert at redirecting peoples anger to the appropriate
> > department. Recent cases include a 20 foot tall white pine that was cut
> > down to install some underground utilities (this was announced a week in
> > advance, but that didn't help assuage the woman whose office window
> > looks out on the tree, which was the preferred perch for goldfinches and
> > purple finches), a green ash on campus that had emerald ash borer, and
> > several half dead trees on the greenway that are overtopped by other
> > trees because they were planted too close together.
> >
> > Lee
> >
> > Bob wrote:
> > > Jenny
> > >
> > >       I have much the same reaction wherever I go in urban parks.
> > > People are so unattuned to the natural world. The natural features
> > > might as well he replaced by concrete replicas.  Even when there are
> > > big trees, I find myself mumbling under my breath. Can't wait to get
> > > out of Boston.
> > >
> > > Bob
> > >
> > > Sent from my iPhone
> > >
> > > On Nov 29, 2009, at 3:18 AM, [email protected]
> > > <mailto:[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Bob, Steve, Jess, Ed,
> > >>
> > >> Bob, welcome to my hell!!!!   I have thought about these things so so
> > >> much while scouring the NYC parks to bond with the bit of nature on
> > >> offer.
> > >>
> > >> My reactions to people I encounter in these situations are pretty
> > >> much unfair and judgmental!!
> > >>
> > >> I don't understand people who study birds yet don't also take note of
> > >> the tree or other perching/habitat environment. But I have 'issues'
> > >> in general with "birders" mostly based on the lack of interest they
> > >> have in the birds themselves. Many are just list keepers, collectors,
> > >> like you were saying. I understand but I don't like it. On my
> > >> Colorado night migration workshop in September I was the only one
> > >> excited about the whole ecological experience as opposed to just the
> > >> birds. Weird.
> > >>
> > >> I can't believe people don't teach their kids general respect for
> > >> nature. Kids kick trees and try to kick birds - and I completely
> > >> understand them for doing it - but I don't understand their parents
> > >> for not stopping them.  When I say something I talk directly to the
> > >> kid and say things in the nicest possible way, hopefully with humor.
> > >>  And in that way, maybe a tiny bit of awareness will sink in.
> > >>
> > >> I know birds and trees are not human, but I could never treat them as
> > >> unfeeling beings - even the tree in its way, is sentient.
> > >>
> > >>  I hate the Fordham students jogging through NYBG and I would hate
> > >> anyone jogging in the Arnold Arboretum. Exceptions are people running
> > >> with their big dogs who need a good run. But honestly, why not just
> > >> take a a strenuous hike? I bet they drove to the Arboretum anyway,
> > >>
> > >> As for them appreciating their surroundings by going to the Arboretum
> > >> to jog, I think they sure do appreciate the environment for
> > >> themselves but don't give a "care" about anybody elses' experience.
> > >> There are more than enough municipal parks for jogging. I think it's
> > >> offensive. When people jog through the NYBG forest, I think it's
> > >> really unnecessary and a little insulting to people that have paid to
> > >> enjoy the experience. Especially since the Bronx River Park is just
> > >> across the blvd.  
> > >>
> > >> Fair or unfair, there you have it. It's the obliviousness of people
> > >> that absolutely torments me. Makes for some damn long unhappy days in
> > >> NYC, but I do my best....
> > >>
> > >> Jenny
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: Jess Riddle <[email protected]
> > <mailto:[email protected]>>
> > >> To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> > >> Sent: Sat, Nov 28, 2009 11:59 pm
> > >> Subject: Re: [ENTS] Observing nature...
> > >>
> > >> Steve,
> > >>
> > >> Interesting question.  I don't know enough relevant information to
> > >> make come up with a good answer, but I'm not going to let that 
> keep me
> > >> from speculating.
> > >>
> > >> Eyeballs help make an entity cute.  Humans have many body parts in
> > >> common with other vertebrates, so its natural to anthropomorphize
> > >> animals.  Anthropomorphizing could lead to an emotional connection.
> > >> Plants are more difficult to identify with, and hence less commonly
> > >> cared about.
> > >>
> > >> For motile animals, natural selection favors individuals that 
> that pay
> > >> attention to movement in their environment.  Hence, moving birds
> > >> naturally become the focus of human attention, while no analogous
> > >> process exists to draw our attention to an individual tree.
> > >>
> > >> I enjoy finding things: fossils, rare plants, and of course big 
> trees.
> > >>  I don't know how universally people enjoy searching (although Waldo
> > >> suggests I'm not alone), but birds seem like a convenient goal for
> > >> those who like searching.  Birds exhibit patterns of behaviour
> > >> allowing the development of search strategies, and the birds present
> > >> at a given site changes daily.  Once found, the behaviour can become
> > >> the focus of attention, which is not possible with plants (with a few
> > >> notable exceptions like carnivorous plants).
> > >>
> > >> Bob,
> > >>
> > >> All those people frustrating you could have chosen to walk at a 
> track,
> > >> in a mall, or on a treadmill.  However, they made the conscious
> > >> decision to go to the arboretum.  That decision suggests to me 
> that on
> > >> some level they do appreciate their surroundings.
> > >>
> > >> Jess
> > >>
> > >> On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 10:58 PM, Steve Galehouse
> > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> > >> > ENTS-
> > >> >
> > >> > Today my oldest son and I returned to the Cuyahoga Valley to
> > investigate
> > >> > some sites for potential reports.  We didn't spend much time
> > measuring,
> > >> > rather just hiked to explore unfamiliar areas(did measure a white
> > ash to
> > >> > 132', and a sycamore to 13' 10'' cbh and 113'). The neatest 
> thing we
> > >> > observed was a snowy owl, perched in a tree in an area of larger
> > trees. It's
> > >> > very unusual for one to be in Ohio, but my trusty Peterson's
> > guide says it
> > >> > can happen---which brings me to the primary question of this
> > post: Why are
> > >> > more people, generally, interested in birding than observing and
> > measuring
> > >> > trees? I think we all can attest that on a trail we would more 
> likely
> > >> > encounter a birder with a $800-$1200 Zeiss binocular around the
> > neck than a
> > >> > tree measurer with a $200 Nikon rangefinder and $100
> > inclinometer. I'm in no
> > >> > way anti-birding, but knowing the woods seems so much more
> > basic--the types
> > >> > of trees determine the species of birds and mammals present. The
> > >> > avian-centric position seems to be expressed in the promotional
> > literature
> > >> > of park systems also, where rare or unusual species of birds
> > present are
> > >> > stressed, without mention of the forest community that attracted
> > them. And
> > >> > Jenny, this in no way is meant to disparage your rescue efforts
> > in NYC.
> > >> >
> > >> > Steve
> > >> >
> > >> > --
> > >> > Eastern Native Tree Society http://www.nativetreesociety.org
> > >> > Send email to [email protected]
> > <mailto:[email protected]>
> > >> > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/entstrees?hl=en
> > >> > To unsubscribe send email to
> > [email protected]
> > <mailto:[email protected]>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Eastern Native Tree Society http://www.nativetreesociety.org
> > >> Send email to [email protected]
> > <mailto:[email protected]>
> > >> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/entstrees?hl=en
> > >> To unsubscribe send email to [email protected]
> > <mailto:[email protected]>
> > >> --
> > >> Eastern Native Tree Society http://www.nativetreesociety.org
> > >> Send email to [email protected]
> > >> <mailto:[email protected]>
> > >> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/entstrees?hl=en
> > >> To unsubscribe send email to [email protected]
> > >> <mailto:[email protected]>
> > > --
> > > Eastern Native Tree Society http://www.nativetreesociety.org
> > > Send email to [email protected]
> > > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/entstrees?hl=en
> > > To unsubscribe send email to [email protected]
> >
> > --
> > Eastern Native Tree Society http://www.nativetreesociety.org
> > Send email to [email protected]
> > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/entstrees?hl=en
> > To unsubscribe send email to [email protected]
> > --
> > Eastern Native Tree Society http://www.nativetreesociety.org
> > Send email to [email protected]
> > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/entstrees?hl=en
> > To unsubscribe send email to [email protected]
>
> -- 
> Eastern Native Tree Society http://www.nativetreesociety.org
> Send email to [email protected]
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/entstrees?hl=en
> To unsubscribe send email to [email protected]
> -- 
> Eastern Native Tree Society http://www.nativetreesociety.org
> Send email to [email protected]
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/entstrees?hl=en
> To unsubscribe send email to [email protected]

-- 
Eastern Native Tree Society http://www.nativetreesociety.org 
Send email to [email protected] 
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/entstrees?hl=en 
To unsubscribe send email to [email protected]

Reply via email to