Steve,

I also think Scots pine has the greatest range of pines. Quaking aspen
could be the winner of all tree species too. I can say nothing about
the reliability of the book I referred.

- Kouta

On 10 tammi, 23:45, Steve Galehouse <[email protected]> wrote:
> Kouta, ENTS-
>
> If I recall correctly, Scots pine, a common associate of Norway spruce, has
> the greatest range of any pine.  I think quaking aspen might be a contender
> for greatest range also.
>
> Steve
>
> 2010/1/10 Kouta Räsänen <[email protected]>
>
> > Steve, ENTS,
>
> > If Siberian spruce is considered a subspecies (P. abies subsp.
> > obovata) of Norway spruce, it certainly have the greatest natural
> > range of any spruce. If they are considered two species (P. abies and
> > P. obovata), white spruce (P. glauca) may have greater range. Once I
> > leafed a tree book in a book store; there was a question, which is the
> > tree species with the greatest range in the world. The author supposed
> > it could be white spruce, Siberian larch (L. sibirica) or Dahurian
> > larch (L. gmelinii). I don't remember the name of the book; I think it
> > was an American book translated to German.
>
> > - Kouta
>
> > On 10 tammi, 23:07, Steve Galehouse <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > Gaines, ENTS-
>
> > > Here are a few pics of Norway spruce in my area. They have probably the
> > > greatest natural range of any spruce, so as has been mentioned there is a
> > > great variety of growth habits. The photos show what I consider typical
> > for
> > > my area. The first shows mature trees in the landscape with what I
> > consider
> > > a tattered look, usually becoming around 70' tall. The second shows a
> > > relatively young and vigorous tree(already running out of  room). The
> > third
> > > shows a very common mistake---the Norway spruce is only 3' off the corner
> > of
> > > the garage, and only about 15' from the Colorado spruce in the center.
>
> > > I think the reason I'm not as fond of Norways as most in the group appear
> > to
> > > be is due to their misuse in a landscape situation---there are so many
> > other
> > > species and/or varieties of conifers that do a better job in relatively
> > > confined areas. When they are in a "forest" situation, combined with
> > other
> > > conifers and deciduous trees, or treated as specimen trees in large park
> > > settings, they are perfectly acceptable.
>
> > > Steve

Reply via email to