From: "Bob Talbot" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >But: there is one area where I would like the IS. That is for >panning flight shots of birds where a tripod does not give the >flexibility to smoothly follow the beastie. At present I do those >with a non-IS 200 (or 300). As conviced of the usefulness of IS as I am, I have had precious little success getting birds in flight with the 300/2.8 IS. More experimentation is required perhaps but, so far, I have not found it at all useful for this purpose. -- Terence A. Danks Nova Scotia, Canada Wildlife and Nature Photography http://www3.ns.sympatico.ca/danksta/home.htm * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
- Re: EOS Plans for IS on 70-200 f/... Bob Sull
- Re: EOS Plans for IS on 70-20... Rafal Walas
- Was: EOS Plans for IS on 70-200 f/2.8 Buddy
- Re: EOS Plans for IS on 70-200 f/2.8 Marco Kost
- Re: EOS Plans for IS on 70-200 f/2.8 Pat Chaney
- RE: EOS Plans for IS on 70-200 f/2.8 Felix Lopez de Maturana
- Re: EOS Plans for IS on 70-200 f/2.8 Bob Talbot
- Re: EOS Plans for IS on 70-200 f/... Bob Sull
- Re: EOS Plans for IS on 70-200 f/... Rafal Walas
- Re: EOS Plans for IS on 70-200 f/2.8 YEGEY
- Re: EOS Plans for IS on 70-200 f/2.8 Terry Danks
- Re: EOS Plans for IS on 70-200 f/2.8 Bob Talbot
- Re: EOS Plans for IS on 70-200 f/... Lee Hiers
- Re: EOS Plans for IS on 70-20... Ray Amos
- Re: EOS Plans for IS on 70-200 f/2.8 F. Craig Callahan
- Re: EOS Plans for IS on 70-200 f/2.8 Bill Jameson
- Re: EOS Plans for IS on 70-200 f/2.8 Skip
- Re: EOS Plans for IS on 70-200 f/2.8 Gary Russell
- Re: EOS: EF 75-300 IS [was Plans ... F. Craig Callahan
- RE: EOS: EF 75-300 IS [was Pl... John \"Salty\" Stines
