From: "Bob Talbot" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

>But:  there is one area where I would like the IS.  That is for
>panning flight shots of birds where a tripod does not give the
>flexibility to smoothly follow the beastie.  At present I do those
>with a non-IS 200 (or 300).

As conviced of the usefulness of IS as I am, I have had precious little success
getting birds in flight
with the 300/2.8 IS. More experimentation is required perhaps but, so far, I
have not found it at all useful for
this purpose.

--
Terence A. Danks
Nova Scotia, Canada
Wildlife and Nature Photography
http://www3.ns.sympatico.ca/danksta/home.htm


*
****
*******
***********************************************************
*  For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
*    http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************

Reply via email to