OK, I found it on B&H.
http://www01.bhphotovideo.com/default.sph/FrameWork.class?FNC=ProductActivator__Aproductlist_html___278___178156___KE1.4XP300CA___REG___SID=E3E137D5980
It's $172.00 and if my calculations are right, it would give me a 190mm f/8
IS Lens from my 28-135 lens, because my lens is f/5.6 at the 135mm end. I
would then lose autofocus, I guess, on my EOS 7E.
Not too impressive... because I would only get f/16 exposure by stopping
down just a little to get decent resolution. However, on a tripod, f/16 is
quite OK.
I wonder how this Kenko TC would do on a Canon 300 f/4L IS Lens... 420mm
f/5.6 with IS is tempting... Is the Kenko Pro 300 1.4x TC really as good as
the Canon? Are there tests of these things somewhere?
Pierre
At 08:14 12/26/2000 -0500, you wrote:
>Hi,
>
>It's probably not the Tele Converter they sell for $79.95 at B&H. That
>would be nice, though...
>
>http://www01.bhphotovideo.com/default.sph/FrameWork.class?FNC=ProductActivator__Aproductlist_html___278___63685___KE1.5XCAF___REG___SID=E3E137D5980
>
>Where can I find more info about these Kenko 300 pro TeleConverters?
>
>Pierre
>
>PS - I have also posted this to the EOS List because of the question I am
>asking about the Kenko TC.
>
>At 09:24 12/26/2000 -0200, you wrote:
>
>>Pierre, one alternative (that I use), are the Kenko 300 pro TC, they cost
>>much less than the canons and in my opinion same quality. I have one friende
>>that have the 2 TC from canon and we test both canon and kenko and even in
>>extra large photos we can�t see the diference. The color and resolution was
>>same. You can use the 1.4 X with the 28-135 IS too, with day light you will
>>have no probelm with focus and acetable 5X4 at the log and. This is great
>>for trips where you dont want to hand lots of equipmant.
>>
>>Fred
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
