It's the long end of the lens (from 200 to 300) that interests me (because
I already have the 28-135), and I've read that it's not where the 75-300
shines.
Pierre
At 22:24 12/25/2000 -0500, you wrote:
>"Pierre Bellavance" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I prefer IS lenses, so I will look into the 300 or the 100-400.
>
>Hi Pierre,
>
>Don't forget the EF 75-300 IS USM, which was the first EF lens
>with an Image Stabilizer function...
>
>Cheers
>Julian Loke
>P.S. Will Canon ever make an Image Stabilizing teleconverter?
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
