Gary, I'd be interested in hearing which of the Kenko Pro converters you
have (1.4, 2x or both) and your overall thoughts, as well as comments from
others with direct experience. My primary use would be with the Canon 70-200
f/2.8 and 300 f/4, and I was thinking of getting the Kenko 2x. As I
understand it, these combinations should work fine on my EOS 3.
In terms of compatibility, has anyone used these with slower zooms with the
loss of AF? I'm thinking of times when I might could also use one or both
converters when I'm carrying a smaller kit, perhaps the 28-135 or 100-300
(the current USM, non "L" version) lenses.
TIA for your comments.
tompc
----- Original Message -----
From: "Gary A. Thurlow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2001 6:22 PM
Subject: Re: EOS TC & co
>
> Fred, I disagree that the Canon is better - at least in my experience, the
> Kenko Pro is not only equal to the Canon optically, but doesn't seem to
> have the same limitations as the Canon as to lens compatibility and
> autofocusing. I may be prejudiced, but I really didn't like the Sigma
that
> I tried. I have not tried the Tamron.
>
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
