----- Original Message -----
From: Gary A. Thurlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2001 9:22 PM
Subject: Re: EOS TC & co
>
> Fred, I disagree that the Canon is better - at least in my experience, the
> Kenko Pro is not only equal to the Canon optically, but doesn't seem to
> have the same limitations as the Canon as to lens compatibility and
> autofocusing. I may be prejudiced, but I really didn't like the Sigma
that
> I tried. I have not tried the Tamron.
>
> Gary
>
> At 01:42 PM 2/13/01, you wrote:
> >I have one TC 1.4X kenko 300 pro and will buy one 2X. The question is,
> >
> >wicth one are better
> >
> >kenko 300 Pro
> >Tamron Sp
> >Sigma EX
> >Canon
>
Gary, I agree with you I tryed the canon 1.4X this weekend and got the
result today. I could�t see any diference to the kenko 1.4X 300 Pro that I
have with the 200 2.8 L, even with large photos. I didn�t try the Sigma and
the Tamron but I have notice that Tamron SP are same of Kenko 300 pro.
Fred
Frederico Samarane
Belo Horizonte - MG
30.575-100
Brazil
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (work)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (home)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (palm)
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
