[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jan 21, 2001 at 09:22:51PM -0800, Skip wrote:
>
> > that the 28-135, 75-300 and 100-400IS are not
> > recommended for use on a tripod with the IS turned on. I've done it,
> > inadvertently, with no ill affects, but I guess the theory is that the
> > lack of movement may encourage the IS elements to create some of their
> > own. Of course, if you are in a high wind, or on a slightly unstable
> > platform, the IS may prove to be a help. The fixed focal length IS
> > lenses, 300 2.8 and 5.6, 400, 500 and 600 are all tripod compatible, I
> > think.
>
> I don't think there's a 300/5.6IS, but the 300/4L IS is no more
> tripod-compatible than the 100-400L IS is. Only the latest
> batch, 300/2.8, 400/2.8, 500/4 and 600/4, have officially
> tripod-compatible IS.
>
> --
> Tapani Tarvainen
Sorry, meant f4, and that was the one I wasn't sure of! Thanks for the
clarification.
Skip
--
Shadowcatcher Imagery
http://www.shadowcatcherimagery.com
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
