I had the 28-105 and I sold it to get the 28-135 IS and I'm very happy I did.
IS is so great that I leave it on all the time, even at 1/500 second. Can't
hurt...
Pierre
At 12:47 1/24/2001 -0800, you wrote:
>I am in the market to buy a new lens, covering the 24-80 (or 105) range to
>replace the 28-80 USM (crappy) lens. I am looking for good image quality. It
>does not have to be the exact focal lenghts I mentioned. I will use such
>lens most of the time, and am planning to use it to shoot outdoors as well
>as indoor dance pictures (swing and salsa dancing) using my 420ex flash
>(dance pictures require fast focusing). I already have a Canon Elan IIe,
>50mm 1.8, and 100-300 5.6.
>
>I am considering 28-135 IS, along with Sigma 28-70mm f/2.8 EX Aspherical,
>Tokina AF28-70mm f/2.6-2.8 AT-X
>PRO HLD, Tokina AF28-80mm f/2.8 AT-X PRO. Any other ideas? HOw about 28-105
>F2.8 TAMRON Asperical? I think there were more recent Canon lenses covering
>this range as well. There is also the used 28-80 F2.8-4 L USM, but that
>seems a bit more expensive around $750, and might be too big to carry
>around.
>
>Any feedback is appreciated.
>
>Evrim
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
