> >
> The original ones were (are) excellent. Canon is charging a lot more for
> what, 'very excellent'? Sounds way overpriced to me.
>
>
I don't claim to be fluent in French, but I think the article says something
more like:
"Optical performance SHOULD be improved due to a reduction in internal stray
light; future testing SHOULD substantiate this."
I bought the Kenko Pro 1.4x, and it was about a third less than the Canon,
which wasn't a huge savings, but when I get around to buying a 2x, it looks
like there will be a BIG price difference.
At the least, I hope my French in this case is better than my math ;^)
tomp
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
