Hi,
It depends on what you want from it.
If it's convenience, go for the modern 100-300 USM.
If it's for picture quality at the long end, go for the antique (but quite
good) 100-300 f/5.6L
I almost bought the 100-300 f/5.6L (at the current price, it's a deal, in
my opinion) but have decided to go for the 100-400 IS Zoom instead, for the
long run.
Pierre
At 17:08 2/23/2001 -0600, you wrote:
>Looking to replace an 11 year old 70-210. Which of these two would you
>recommend. The 100-300 4.5-5.6 is $300 and the 5.6L is $350.
>
>The lens will be used 10-15x a year at the racetrack (cars) and during
>vacations on a Elan IIe.
>
>Thanks,
>Andrew
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
