The booster fit is fine, in fact I had an older bag I used to use with a
Minolta X700 with attached MD-1 motor and Tokina 80-200 f/2.8, and this fit
the Canon fine, but was too short/narrow to accomodate the Canon 70-200
f/2.8L with the hood. In fact, I wish somebody would come over and help me
find that old bag, I really liked it and I've managed to misplace it. (I
think it would have worked fine with the 28-135.
As for shoulder balance, I'm pretty heavy and so is the loaded Pro AW just
because all of the stuff in it (and in me!), but I can stay comfortable with
it on the sidelines for the duration of a game.
Tom P.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tim Munro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2001 3:29 PM
Subject: EOS Re:Topload Zoom Pro AW
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tom Pfeiffer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > I got the Topload Zoom Pro AW because it was one of the few
> > camera-with-a-long-lens-attached bags that would hold a body WITH a
> booster
> > attached.
>
> Hi Tom, I have thought of getting a snoot type bag for the 1v + PB-E2 +
> 28-70 or 70-200. It is hard to find anything deep enough, but I did see
one
> of the bags you mentioned above somewhere recently, I didn't have my gear
> with me to test it for size though. Does it fit well with the booster
> attached? and how well balanced is it on the shoulder when full? I would
be
> grateful for any other comments you might have on it from your experience
of
> using it.
> Regards, Tim
>
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
