> "Thomas Bantel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I had a look at both addresses, but all I see are some graphics, can't
> read the text :-( Can you read it and if yes, is it a real explanation
> of evaluative metering?
> ...
> 1) Highest weigh (Sensor zone + immediate neighbors)
> 2) Medium weight (Close to the sensor zone)
> 3) Least weight (Rest)
Hi Thomas and List,
Sorry, the translation URLs were on a previous post. Here they are:
http://world.altavista.com/tr?lp=ja%5Fen&tt=url&url=http%3A//www.canon%2Dsales.co.jp/7/product/point4/index%2Dj.html
and
http://world.altavista.com/tr?lp=ja%5Fen&tt=url&url=http%3A//www.canon%2Dsales.co.jp/7/tech/page/p03.html
Systran gives the following translation for the four colours:
. Main subject photometry area
. Intermediate photometry area
. Peripheral photometry area
. Non-photometry area
It looks EXACTLY like the centre-weighted metering pattern, except
that the "centre" is on the active focussing point.
If this were so, evaluative metering would be *very* predictable, and
exposure compensation could be applied intelligently.
What did the EOS Magazine article say?
Cheers
Julian Loke
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
