Greg Au wrote:
>
> I have tried this combination. I can't afford a prime 400/2.8L but FWIW, the
> 100-400L combo with 2X yields acceptable results. IS still works OK, and I
> find the optical quality is acceptable.
If the quality using the old 2x is "acceptable", then with the new
2x-II, the quality should be "good", a notch above "acceptable". This
is based on Canon claims, misc. reviews and my personal observations.
Ray Amos
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
