>If the quality using the old 2x is "acceptable", then with the new
>2x-II, the quality should be "good", a notch above "acceptable". This
>is based on Canon claims, misc. reviews and my personal observations.
>Ray Amos
Which reviews? I've never tested the new converters but according to
French magazine "Chasseur d'Images", in practical terms, the quality is
about the same. The only major difference, according to them, is that
they are "sealed" with that rubber o-ring (or whatever they call it).
I'd like to see some other reviews.
Hugo Lopes
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
