>> Julian Loke wrote:
>> http://www.camera.canon.com.my/photography/art/art14/02.htm
>> Can anyone explain to me the point of his article?

> "Thomas Bantel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No, I can't ;-) I have to admit I read only the first page. I
> stopped there having read the remark about the "perfect" exposure
> of the biker despite the bright background. To my eyes, the
> exposure is correct for the bright background but not for the
> biker, who is clearly underexposed IMHO. ...

Hi Thomas,

Maybe the image was digitally manipulated with "Auto-Levels"?

But the author's explanations of exposure still do not make
sense to me after several readings.

Cheers
Julian Loke

*
****
*******
***********************************************************
*  For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
*    http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************

Reply via email to