I'm thinking about buying the 17-35 2.8 L. I'm still not sure because the 24
1.4 seems to be a very good alternative. The trade-off would be zoom
versatility for the 17-35 versus two extra stops and better optical quality
for the 24. Any thoughts? Has anyone ever compared the optical quality of
these two lenses? Is the 24 really better?
Thanks,
Harrie
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
