Hi all,
I recently purchased an EF100-400 L IS zoom and am loving the
versatility of it. I also own a EF300mm f/4 L IS and am considering
selling it (even though it is my favorite lens) since it seems
extraneous with the new zoom. What I'm wondering is if there is someone
out there with both EF100-400 L and a EF300mm f/2.8, and whether you
find your self using the 300mm f/2.8 and for what uses? Is it worth
getting so that I can stack an extender on it or am I better off selling
my internal organs for a EF500mm? I handhold mostly, since I shoot alot
with field biologists, and since I am the dummy, I have to carry field
equipment rather than a heavy brain which leaves little room for a good
tripod. Which Is why I've shied away from the really long telephotos.
Does anyone handhold the 300mm f/2.8?
I shoot mostly mammals with my telephoto lenses. My other photographic
subjects include abstracts (for which is use the 28-135 IS) and macro
(for which I use my 100mm and 180mm macro). Oh yeah, I shoot with an
aging Rebel G (having spent my money on glass) .
Thanks,
Jeff
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
