I think we are both saying the same things: that bad bokeh is one of
the weaknesses of the 100-400, so if I shoot with that lens, there are
certain things to avoid. On the other hand, you make a point that
choosing a more expensive lens with better bokeh would also solve the
problem.
The bokeh comparison that most interests me are these three:
EF 400 f/5.6 L USM
EF 100-400 f/4.5-5.6 L IS USM
EF 400 f/4 DO IS USM
The "bright-ring" bokeh of the 100-400 can even be seen in the viewfinder
by defocussing an image of a distance point source of light (e.g. lamp).
Has anyone looked in the DO lens to see what happens in the same situation?
Cheers
Julian Loke
========================
If it (The 100-400 IS) works for Andy Rouse then it works for me (And it
does too :-)
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
