Julian Loke wrote: The reports that I read also point out that the 80-400 VR bokeh is, ummm, not very good. -------------------------------------------------------------------- Oooooooohhhhh no! :-o Bad bokeh. Thank you Nikon. I will just have to keep using my Canon lenses. ;-) Peter K * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
- Re: EOS EF 400mm f4 DO Ray Amos
- Re: EOS EF 400mm f4 DO John
- Re: EOS EF 400mm f4 DO Julian Loke
- Re: EOS EF 400mm f4 DO Ray Amos
- Re: EOS EF 400mm f4 DO Julian Loke
- EOS 100 - 400 L USM ... herman
- Re: EOS 100 - 400 L ... Pierre Bellavance
- Re: EOS 100 - 400 L ... Tapani Tarvainen
- Re: EOS 100 - 400 L ... F. Craig Callahan
- Re: EOS 100 - 400 L ... Mortimer Snerd
- RE: EOS EF 400mm f4 DO Kotsinadelis, Peter (Peter)
- RE: EOS EF 400mm f4 DO p . wagemans
- Re: EOS EF 400mm f4 DO Sir Douglas the Fearless
- Re: EOS EF 400mm f4 DO c . p . valentine
- Re: EOS EF 400mm f4 DO Shawn Knapp
- Re: EOS EF 400mm f4 DO Bob Meyer
- RE: EOS EF 400mm f4 DO p . wagemans
- Re: EOS EF 400mm f4 DO Mark
- Re: EOS EF 400mm f4 DO Julian Loke
