Gary Lim wrote:
> > I was reading this review article of 28-105 MKII and got me to think of
> the
> > built quality of MKI. It seems the MKII incorporate a lot more metal than
> > MKI like the bottom plate as well as the zooming cam. As a result,
> > according to the article anyway, MkI will suffer from lost of sharpness in
> > the long run compared to MK II. Here is the link:
> >
> > http://www.camera.canon.com.my/photography/nut/2000iss/nuts56/index.htm
> >
My mkI looks more like the mkII, with word "macro" on lens barrel instad of
flower symbol and the "edgier" design near the lens mount (exactly like the mkII
in the article pics). It's also the 7 aperture blade design (first version had 5).
Question is, was this "more metal design" incorporated earlier than with the
mkII realease, perhaps already with the change from 5 to 7 aperture blades?
/Johan
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
