> You've sparked my curiosity now, and I'll be keeping my eyes
> open for a
> good used 300/4 L. As to the range between 135 and 300 that I'll be
> without - likely I'll never miss it. I won't sell my 75-300, but it's very
> unlikely I'll carry it with me shooting after getting a 300 L.
I got the 75-300 USM almost immediately after I got my camera, and bought a
second-hand 300/4 L a few months ago (got a very good deal on it <G>).
Although the prime lens is heavier and not as versatile, I can see a
difference in the quality of my photos.
If you think you'll be taking most of your photos at 300mm and you can
afford it, I'd recommend the prime lens. But I still have the 75-300 --
don't use it much, but I'll admit there are times when I need the range.
Pattie
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
