> > > You've sparked my curiosity now, and I'll be keeping my eyes
> > > open for a
> > > good used 300/4 L. As to the range between 135 and 300 that I'll be
> > > without - likely I'll never miss it. I won't sell my 75-300, but it's
very
> > > unlikely I'll carry it with me shooting after getting a 300 L.
> >
> > I got the 75-300 USM almost immediately after I got my camera, and
bought a
> > second-hand 300/4 L a few months ago (got a very good deal on it <G>).
> > Although the prime lens is heavier and not as versatile, I can see a
> > difference in the quality of my photos.
> >
> > If you think you'll be taking most of your photos at 300mm and you can
> > afford it, I'd recommend the prime lens. But I still have the 75-300 --
> > don't use it much, but I'll admit there are times when I need the range.
> >
> > Pattie
>
>
> KEH.com has one listed for $725 in excellent condition.
> Skip
Hey, that's only a month's rent, heh heh. Now if I could only convince the
wife that's all it is...
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
