> Hi maybe the question sound strange but i've just bought a 70-200. And i'm
> really concerned by its weight.
>
I'll gladly take it off your hands :-)
> I'm wondering if there is any data about the quality of images with IS
> cheaper lenses as compared to L lenses without IS? As i'm considering also
> buying a 28-70 L
> 2.8 ... and already have a 28-135 i'm wondering if it's worth it!!
Provided you use proper technique (tripod, mirror lockup etc.), I don't
think you will find evidence the EF28-135 will give you a better result than
the EF28-70L. While the cost may be highter than it should be, the superior
quality and faster aperature of the EF28-70L are enough for those who needs
and wants and can afford the lens to purchase them.
Regards,
Ken
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
