--- Ken Lin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Provided you use proper technique (tripod, mirror
> lockup etc.), I don't
> think you will find evidence the EF28-135 will give
> you a better result than
> the EF28-70L. While the cost may be highter than it
> should be, the superior
> quality and faster aperature of the EF28-70L are
> enough for those who needs
> and wants and can afford the lens to purchase them.
I agree with you to some extend. But also consider
that for many kinds of photgraphy a tripod is not a
proper technique as you would have missed the shot a
long time before you have setup your camera (if
possible at all).
Also, unless you need shallow DOF, a brighter
viewfinder, or need to use the middle AF point to take
advantage of the cross-sensor the 2.8 won't help
anything more then IS. Actually, if you want max DOF
then you are even better of with the IS lens. In
addition to that when you stop down the difference
between the two lenses becomes even smaller.
So, it really depends on what kind of shooting you do.
Robert
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail
http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
