In a message dated 7/12/01 2:56:26 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
<< I'm wondering if there is any data about the quality of images with IS
cheaper lenses as compared to L lenses without IS? As i'm considering also
buying a 28-70 L
2.8 ... and already have a 28-135 i'm wondering if it's worth it!! >>
Hi,
Just like others said, it depends on what and how you shoot. I used to have
Canon 28-135IS and sold it in favor of Tokina 28-80 ATX Pro 2.8. I prefer
fast glass, and Tokina ahs great glass too without costing as much as Canon
L.
You can read more about it on my web site, in Photography --> Reviews section.
But in short, I'm more satisfied with Tokina, than I was with Canon 28-135IS.
Although, Canon is a great "ONE LENS" setup for travel snapshots with good
optics and IS is great too. As I got more into slides vs prints, Tokina
produces better images for me. So, its a matter of taste and your shooting
style.
George
My web page:
http://members.nbci.com/_XMCM/Yegey/EntrancePage.html
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
