Brendan Bleheen wrote: > Two theories: > 1) List members have heard the boy who cried 70-200 f2.8 IS once too often, > and are ignoring it when it really comes (if it really comes this time) 1A: It's going to be too expensive anyway, so why get all worked up about it? :-) fcc * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
- Re: EOS 70-200 f2.8 IS - Where is everyone? Ken Durling
- Re: EOS 70-200 f2.8 IS - Where is everyone? YEGEY
- RE: EOS 70-200 f2.8 IS - Where is everyone? Pattie Anderson
- Re: EOS 70-200 f2.8 IS - Where is everyone? Ken Durling
- Re: EOS 70-200 f2.8 IS - Where is everyone? Jaros�aw Brzezi�ski
- Re: EOS 70-200 f2.8 IS - Where is everyone? Bob Meyer
- Re: EOS 70-200 f2.8 IS - Where is everyone? Olivier PARIS
- Re: EOS 70-200 f2.8 IS - Where is everyone? Jaros�aw Brzezi�ski
- Re: EOS 70-200 f2.8 IS - Where is everyone? F. Craig Callahan
- Re: EOS 70-200 f2.8 IS - Where is everyone? Bob Sull
- Re: EOS 70-200 f2.8 IS - Where is everyone? Ken Durling
- EOS 70-200 f2.8 IS - Where is everyone? Gary Russell
- RE: EOS 70-200 f2.8 IS - Where is everyone? thomas . tanida
- Re: EOS 70-200 f2.8 IS - Where is everyone? Gary Russell
- Re: EOS 70-200 f2.8 IS - Where is everyone? Martijn Stol
- Re: EOS 70-200 f2.8 IS - Where is everyone? lmichael
- RE: EOS 70-200 f2.8 IS - Where is everyone? Terry Danks
- Re: EOS 70-200 f2.8 IS - Where is everyone? Keith Green
