I don't think IS be extremely useful for macro photography. It is often the object movement, not the camera movement, what causes troubles. > I think the 100/2.8 and 180/3.5 Macro lenses are screaming for IS! They > should get the nod for the next IS-equipped lenses, even though the new > USM equipped 100/2.8 is a year old (or thereabouts). -- Lars Michael [EMAIL PROTECTED] 87GT http://www.larsmichael.com/ * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
- Re: EOS 70-200 f2.8 IS - Where is everyone? Jaros�aw Brzezi�ski
- Re: EOS 70-200 f2.8 IS - Where is everyone? F. Craig Callahan
- Re: EOS 70-200 f2.8 IS - Where is everyone? Bob Sull
- Re: EOS 70-200 f2.8 IS - Where is everyone? Ken Durling
- EOS 70-200 f2.8 IS - Where is everyone? Gary Russell
- RE: EOS 70-200 f2.8 IS - Where is everyone? thomas . tanida
- Re: EOS 70-200 f2.8 IS - Where is everyone? Gary Russell
- Re: EOS 70-200 f2.8 IS - Where is everyone? Martijn Stol
- RE: EOS 70-200 f2.8 IS - Where is everyone? lmichael
- RE: EOS 70-200 f2.8 IS - Where is everyone? Terry Danks
- Re: EOS 70-200 f2.8 IS - Where is everyone? Keith Green
- Re: EOS 70-200 f2.8 IS - Where is everyone? Bob Turner
- Re: EOS 70-200 f2.8 IS - Where is everyone? Keith Green
- Re: EOS 70-200 f2.8 IS - Where is everyone? Bob Meyer
- Re: EOS 70-200 f2.8 IS - Where is everyone? Ken Durling
- Re: EOS 70-200 f2.8 IS - Where is everyone? Grega Fenko
- Re: EOS 70-200 f2.8 IS - Where is everyone? Rafal Walas
- Re: EOS 70-200 f2.8 IS - Where is everyone? BlueSky
