> Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2001 11:59:13 -0500 > From: "Julian Loke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: EOS photographing paintings > > You guys are still using "silver-based" thinking, where you make > the reproduction in one shot.
No, but we also keep in mind the technical disadvantages of stitching and the effort you have to put into the stitching. > If instead you used the D30 to take a NUMBER of shots that SCAN > the surface, it would be possible to reconstruct a composite > MOSAIC using software. The MOSAIC could have arbitrary resolution, > depending on how many pictures you were prepared to take. Sure. And you would need arbitrary amounts of time. > To get 18x24" at 300dpi would require 16 pictures with overlap: > 4 rows and 4 columns. The stitched file would be over 100Mb in > size. No objections to the theory, but I'd rather turn this job down than killing the night stitching..... > Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2001 09:14:30 -0800 > From: "Alan Bell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: EOS photographing paintings > > Reminds me of three-strip Cinerama. But seriously, given a stitched file on > the one hand and a digital camera of comparable quality that could capture > the image in one shot, would there be: > > 4. visible difference, but acceptable. You might be able to overcome perspective distortions and stitching borders, but this takes a lot of work. Not worth the time. -- Michael Quack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
