Margaret Jeffcoat wrote:
> Hi! I'm thinking about adding the 100 F2.8 to my kit. It would be used for
> making
> images of newborns hand and feet-showing size relation to that of a parents
> hand.
> I will shot these in b/w for the most part and they will be done in a more
> soft grainy
> look that is very popular right now. Does anyone have any experience with
> this lens,
> or would the 180/ F3.4 be a better choice?
> Cheers Wilber Jeffcoat
>
I have the 100mm f/2.8 macro and it is a great lens. Very sharp. Mine is the
version before the 100mm f/2.8 USM so the focus isn't very fast by comparison.
But then, I usually use MF when shooting with it.
I have never shot hands and feet, just bugs and flowers. I wonder if you will
need the macro for your shooting. If the subjects are side by side and you
want the entire hand of the parent I think you won't be doing a lot of macro
work.
Bob
--
//////
( 0 0 )
-73 de Bob [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Everybody has a photographic memory. Some just don't have any film.
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
