R Sriram wrote:
> I'd recommend getting the USM version of the 100/2.8. I owned the
> non-USM lens and within 6 months of purchase the AF motor started
> giving me problems (loud grinding noise). I had to send it to Canon 3
> times in 3 months to get it repaired, then dumped it for the new USM
> lens. I hear this is not an uncommon problem with the old lens. Be
> careful.
This is the first I've heard of this "problem". I have had my non-USM 100 macro
for a few years now, and while it is not in daily use I have had no problems with
it.
Bob
--
//////
( 0 0 )
-73 de Bob [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Everybody has a photographic memory. Some just don't have any film.
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
