GreenScreen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: - 3) Personally, I love blurring out the background in my - macro shots sometimes, and 2.8 will to more of that than - 3.5...
- 4) The 100 is an awesome portrait lens. (read: more of a - general purpose lens than a 180) And again, I love blowing - out the background at 2.8 on my portraits. Maybe I need a new calculator, but by my calculations the 180mm at f3.5 and the 100mm at 2.8 have VERY similar depths of field for subjects framed to the same size. I.E. NO gain for the 100mm in terms of blurred backgrounds! Brian Fancher _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
