John M. Lovda wrote:

> This is a very basic question I have 
> never gotten a good technical answer for.
> 
> What makes UD glass so special or expensive?  
> Other L lens attributes such as aspherical or 
> flourite lenses are intuitively obvious since 
> the grinding, molding, deposition or 
> crystal growing techniques are more technically
> complicated than a regular spherical glass lens.  
> What's the deal with low dispersion glass; 
> do the rare earth additives cost a million 
> dollars an ounce?
> Is the glass so hard it takes longer to grind?  
> Is it really fragile and hard to handle with 
> lots of scrap?  Why can Tokina, Sigma or 
> Tamron put UD glass into a much cheaper lens?
> 
> Any optical experts out there?
------------------------------------------------------------------

Well John, since no one answered you directly I will try to add my two
cents. UD glass is one acronym given to (Ultra) Low Dispersion glass.
Tokina calls it SD for Super Low Dispersion glass, and others have their own
acronym.  All transparent materials are dispersive and have what is known as
a refractive index.  This increases as you go toward the blue spectrum.
Noting this, the blue part of a ray of light will bend or reflect when it
strikes a glass surface, resulting in "Chromatic aberration." It was
discovered years back that if you had a weak negative lens of high
dispersion glass element and mate it with a stronger lens of "low
dispersion" glass you would eliminate chromatic aberration forming an
achromatic lens. Achromatic lenses basically bend the light rays back onto
themselves and the colors of the spectrum combine at a common focus point,
in our case the film plane. 
Contrary to popular belief using Low dispersion glass (and it does not have
to be the most expensive kind) can make designing an inexpensive lens easier
with fewer elements needed to correct color. This can keep prices down and
provide a higher performing lens at a lower cost.
On the other hand, certain glass types with specific refractive indices can
be very expensive to make. Canon uses various types in their L lenses and
this is "one" of the reasons for the higher prices with L lenses, the glass
is more expensive and the refractive index varies so they have to make small
batches of specific glass for specific use.
BTW, Canon, Nikon, Tamron, and Cosina make their own glass. Sigma, Tokina,
Pentax, and in some instances Leica use glass made by Hoya (world's largest
glass manufacturer). To dispell another myth, sometimes German lenses will
also Japanese glass. Tamron supplies glass to many including Schneider.
Hope this helps. 

Peter K
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
*  For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
*    http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************

Reply via email to