Icoz, Evrim wrote:
> Hi Steven,
>
> Can;t talk for Ethan, but I am converting to digital in
> weddings because
> a) I can show my brides the pictures very quickly, and they
> can show the
> family who lives far away quickly using the web
> b) for PJ approach, it is important to capture the moment,
> but since they
> are not posed, sometimes you need to take many more pics
> c) 20 rolls of film with proofs at k&k including film : $600
> d) ability to change ISO wihtout switching camera's.
-------------------------------------------------------
You are 100% accurate. A friend of mine actually sets up a PC
with a screen (at the reception) then inserts the images
he took and runs a program that shows them on the
screen with numbers.
People then pick out which ones they want and
pay only $20 for a nice 8x10 which he prints right
there. He averages about $500+ extra each wedding doing this
and the people absolutely love it. Not a bad return.
Yes, the pictures are not as sharp as say an 8 x 10 from a
6x4.5cm negative, but elderly Aunt Millie who lives in Podunk
can now get a copy of the picture she wants while in San Diego.
And Uncle Charlie can get a nice one of the bride & groom and
take it home rather than wait for the thank you card.
With word of mount he is booked into 2005 already.
Peter K
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
