At 400 ISO, film is clearly better, but digital is usable as well, esp. D30! There was a thread last night at dpreview.com about d60 and it seems it is about the same noise level as D30.
I am thinking of doing this: have two digital bodies for regular shots and film camera for formals and available light shots with 3200 film. > Can;t talk for Ethan, but I am converting to digital in > weddings because > a) I can show my brides the pictures very quickly, and they > can show the > family who lives far away quickly using the web > b) for PJ approach, it is important to capture the moment, > but since they > are not posed, sometimes you need to take many more pics > c) 20 rolls of film with proofs at k&k including film : $600 > d) ability to change ISO without switching camera's. > > Ans: Shooting digital allows us to shoot again if we stuff up > a photo. I've > been shooting weddings for the past three years and I must > admit that I've > stuffed up a few photos that I would have loved to recreate. > * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
