>> I'd love Canon to produce an (24)28-105(135) with IS and L-lense quality
>> but constant aparture of 3.5 or 4 to reduce weight..
>> 
>> Still dreaming, Markus.
 

BS> I have to agree with Chip.  Keep the  f/2.8 and the IS out to help keep
BS> the price down.

Or even better: produce it with IS and f/2 at the cost of a 50mm :-)

Dieter (stuck somewhere in the dreamland where all wishes come true)


*
****
*******
***********************************************************
*  For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
*    http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************

Reply via email to