>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Dieter Henkel
>> Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 4:09 PM
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: Re[2]: EOS New 28-70/2.8L ?
>>
>>
>> >> I'd love Canon to produce an (24)28-105(135) with IS and
>> L-lense quality
>> >> but constant aparture of 3.5 or 4 to reduce weight..
>> >>
>> >> Still dreaming, Markus.
>>
>>
>> BS> I have to agree with Chip. Keep the f/2.8 and the IS out to
>> help keep
>> BS> the price down.
>>
>> Or even better: produce it with IS and f/2 at the cost of a 50mm :-)
>>
>> Dieter (stuck somewhere in the dreamland where all wishes come true)
>>
>>
>>
CL> Hey dieter,
CL> Even I have to draw the line at f/2.8 for a 28-105 zoom. It will be too
CL> large, too heavy and way too expensive beyond this aperture and then you
CL> want to ad IS!?!? All IS does is raise the street price $400-$500
CL> [...]
Hello Chip,
I know that - that's why I used the ":-)" and wrote the sentence in
brackets. It *is* impossible.
BTW, I forgot the weight, it has to be the same as the 50/1.8 :-))
--
Best regards,
Dieter mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*
****
*******
***********************************************************
* For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see:
* http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm
***********************************************************
