HI there, I meant the older 80-200 2.8L that does NOT have USM.
I know what you mean about the weight though, after shooting 12 hours of wedding it feels so heavy!!! And that is with only a D60 (granted it had the battery grip and a flash but...). Somehow the 80-200 2.8L is different then the 70-200 4L in terms of image quality. From everything I read, the 70-200 4L and 2.8L are identical, but the 80-200 2.8L is different in terms of 'image quality' then the 70-200. Hard to explain, but I never got an image that I 'wow'ed about from the 70-200 where as I got couple in my first week fo shooting with the 80-200 2.8L. http://www.evrimgallery.com/temp/fashionbride.jpg -e > evrim, is there a 80~200 or are u talking about the 70~200. > it may well be > true that the 2.8 lens is sharper than the f4 lens. i think > both have their > place. depending on the condition and usage. the older i get, the more > weight conscious i become. * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
