----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul Moortgat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, October 06, 2002 8:31 AM Subject: Re: EOS Canon <> Sigma
> I wrote: > > > I hesitate between a Canon 20-35 F3.5 and a Sigma 17-35 F2.8 to have > > somehow a wide-angle lens for my D60. Any comments for one or the > > other. The Canon is 25 Euro more expensive, but that's not the point. > > Now it's even more difficult: I discovered a Sigma 15 mm Fisheye for > 535 Euro. Is this even better to have a wide angle lens. It's just for > panoramic pictures via my D60. > > Paul Moortgat > I have both the Sigma 15mm fisheye and the 17-35mm, and I like both. They seem pretty sturdy, and I haven't had any problems in the year+ that I've owned them. Contrast and saturation seem pretty good, as does sharpness. Distortion, of course, isn't an issue with a fisheye, it come with the territory, but the 17-35 seem pretty good compared to the old Canon 17-35, too. Skip Middleton www.shadowcatcherimagery.com * **** ******* *********************************************************** * For list instructions, including unsubscribe, see: * http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/eos_list.htm ***********************************************************
